Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Should countries pursue policies of imperialism?

   I think that no country should pursue policies of imperialism, or empire expansion. Imperialism can only lead to violence, destruction, and hatred. I am sure no other country wants to be taken over by force. The only reason why a country should be taken is if they agree.
   Imperialism can be violent and destructive, especially during modern times. In the present, a lot of different countries have very destructive weapons. One example is the atomic or nuclear bomb. If imperialism was used, some countries will want to fight back, and could end up bombing each other. Imperialism can also lead to hatred. If one country successfully takes over another, the unfortunate country can hold a grudge. A revolution could occur and only more violence and destruction can be the result.
   In conclusion, imperialism is a horrible policy to follow. No country should use power to take over and expand. Imperialism only causes the destruction of others and peace is ruined.

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Do You Support Imperialism for Your Country?


   I think that Imperialism for my country would be wrong. I think that the United States should not have to spread anymore than it has already. The United States already owns land that is not even connected to the actual continent. For instance, there is Hawaii. Also, going to war with another country could end up being a disaster.
   Imperialism is a horrible way to expand land. I think that it the United States should not use Imperialism because many people could be harmed. I have family in a different country and I would definitely not want the United States to harm the country for the expansion of land.  The United States has the best military in the world, but to use it for taking land from others is not necessary. Imperialism is only a way to show power, in opinion, only shows power and the ability to take advantage. 

Friday, February 3, 2012

Is rising from "Rags to Riches", like Andrew Carnegie, possible? Why?

   I think that it is possible for an individual to rise from "rags to riches", but in a different way than how Andrew Carnegie did.
   Back then, money was worth a lot more than it does now. People could possible make five dollars a day and be happy. But in modern times, money worth is decreasing. The elderly, grandparents, and other older relatives say today that you could pay a nickel back then, just to get something that costs a dollar now. Dollar worth is decreasing because of inflation, which is the rise of prices causing the decrease in worth.
   The way I would think that people could rise from "rags to riches" is by luck with the lottery or going to school and getting a degree, which could get someone a job that pays well. Also, if you use your money in a smart way, you could be the next to have the next best business in the U.S.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Jacob Riis Photo

    The photo is actually pretty depressing. There are three homeless children sitting and sleeping uncomfortably near what looks like a sewer drain, that is outside of a house, near a window. It is sunny outside. The kids have no shoes. They are dressed only from the legs up. Their clothes consist of shorts, shirts, and hats. The kids look as though they have no hope at all. They look like they were abandoned and left to rot. It is sad that no one seemed to consider helping them out.
   The picture looks like it was taken in the 1900's. It is a black and white photo. The picture actually makes the place seem dirtier and more dramatic. One kid is in the corner by himself, while two other kids are in another corner with one kid resting on the other's shoulder. The kid being rested on looks like he is crying.
 

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Comparing: Industrialization in China and A Carnegie factory in the past

   Industrialization in China is definitely similar to a Carnegie factory in the past. Workers worked under harsh conditions, risked being killed or severely injured. Companies only cared about making money and that is what Carnegie was all about.
   According to Carnegie, efficiency, not safety, was paramount. Carnegie made his money with steel mills. Workers received low pay and less job security. His workers had "protective gear" which were two layers of wool long johns. Loud noises, flames, and danger were everywhere in Carnegie mills. Every step a worker took, was considered risky.
   The making of IPads is a great thing for consumers, but unfortunately not for the producers. An explosion occurred in one of the factories which killed and injured many workers. These workers work under harsh conditions and they work for as long as seven days straight. 
   In conclusion, Carnegie Mills from the past and modern Chinese industrialization are similar in many ways.